Google has illegally broken into my Blogs over 100 times. Google is editing, illegally deleting my content, and damaging my Blogs. Google wants to hide the evidence of the felony crimes that they have committed against me and my family.
This is great news. Comey and Brennan need to go to prison for their crimes against President #Trumphttps://t.co/VOmUDqEzCm
— Tom -🇺🇸 🇺🇸- I follow back Patriots (@TomNo1Patriot) July 9, 2025
6-27-25
President Donald Trump has begun his briefing room victory lap after a major Supreme Court win.
“Big one, wasn’t it? This was a big decision,” Trump said from the White House, calling the birthright citizenship ruling an “amazing decision, one that we’re very happy about.”
The president, who is joined by Attorney General Pam Bondi and Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche, said the ruling was a “victory for the Constitution, the separation of powers and the rule of law.”
He said it struck down “the excessive use of nationwide injunctions to interfere with the normal functioning of the executive branch.”
Google is still Censoring people, and Google cannot tell a Real Review from a Fake One
I have authored many reviews and have been advocating against evil Google for censoring people, including me. Google has a long and proven history of unfairly censoring President Trump and his supporters. It is funny that Google is now trying to kiss President Trump's ass. Donald Trump knows and will not forget all the horrible things that Google has done to him.
I have tested Google reviews and have plenty of evidence that Google fails to identify fake reviews, and deletes real reviews.
You should never trust Google.
It also seems that Google is trying to protect bad physicians (medical doctors).
A physician is a health professional who practices medicine. They focus on promoting, maintaining or restoring health. Physicians diagnose and treat diseases, injury and other physical and mental impairments.
The US DOJ is trying to break Google up, and to make Google sell the Chrome browser. I believe the USA government should be doing more detailed investigations into Google and punish evil Google. The Google CEO talks about how important AI is, and how the USA DOJ should not be allowed to regulate how Google uses AI.
Giving Google uncontrolled use of AI, is like giving Iran a nuclear weapon. Google cannot be trusted ...
The trial for the legal case discussed above begins on 9-22-25.
I think it will take a long time before any final decision is made. Then Google could appeal, and this may be in our legal system for years. It benefits Google to delay as much as possible.
As the old legal saying goes ... Deny, Delay, and Do Not pay.
Google plans to appeal a US antitrust ruling regarding its dominance in online search, disagreeing with the court's initial decision and the proposed remedies. The company believes the ruling was flawed and awaits the court's opinion before proceeding with the appeal, according to ET BrandEquity.
The case stems from a trial addressing proposals to curb Google's alleged illegal monopoly in online search and advertising, where a judge found Google guilty of abusing its monopoly power. The US Department of Justice (DOJ) had proposed remedies like divesting key assets, sharing search data, and halting payments to manufacturers for making Google the default search engine. Google argues that these remedies are unnecessary and potentially harmful, potentially impacting consumer privacy and AI innovation. The company has also proposed alternative remedies, including loosening contracts with device manufacturers and creating an independent oversight body.
I have been following and learning about Tesla's RoboTaxi. It started on 6-22-25 in six square miles of Austin Texas.
Please see some of the videos below.
How long will it be before RoboTaxi is expanded to other cities?
Elon Musk says in a year there will be many fully Autonomous Vehicles (AV) and in five years or less almost all new cars will be fully Autonomous.
What will this mean for Uber and Lyft? From what I see RoboTaxi has a nice App, and does not need Uber or Lyft. Why would Tesla pay any money to Uber or Lyft if they do not need them?
In San Fransico the Waymo AV already has more market share then Lyft does. The problem for Waymo is that their AV cost over $250,000 per car.
Have you ever considered that everything you know—the planets, stars, galaxies, and even you—might actually exist inside an enormous black hole?
What if the universe we call home is merely the interior of a cosmic leviathan, swallowing light from another reality we can never directly observe?
For decades, black holes have captured our imagination as cosmic monsters devouring everything in their path, where even light cannot escape their gravitational clutches.
Recent discoveries are forcing scientists to consider an extraordinary possibility: that our entire universe might itself be a black hole. This isn't science fiction, it's a serious scientific hypothesis with growing evidence behind it.
The observable universe is about 93 billion light-years in diameter, based on current measurements and its expansion since the Big Bang 13.8 billion years ago. The total universe's size is unknown; it could be finite, possibly 7 trillion light-years across or much larger, or even infinite. These estimates come from cosmic inflation models, but no direct evidence confirms the total size.
The Hubble tension, a debate over the universe's expansion rate, adds uncertainty but doesn't change the observable universe's size. Large structures like the Hercules–Corona Borealis Great Wall, spanning 10 billion light-years, fit within the observable universe. Future observations may clarify the total size.
— Tom -🇺🇸 🇺🇸- I follow back Patriots (@TomNo1Patriot) June 16, 2025
New transparency reveals by @FBIDirectorKash & @FBIDDBongino show Chris Wray’s FBI compiled intelligence on a China plot to create fake IDs for illegal mail-in ballots for Biden, then CBP intercepted 20,000 fake IDs in Pritkzer’s Chicago, then FBI ordered intelligence destroyed https://t.co/0J3SFBqSHMpic.twitter.com/pB9NI2ixhG
Here's Elon Musk explaining why something like DOGE is logically needed if you have an extended period of peacetime.
“One of the things that always happens with an extended period of peacetime, is a steady increase in the amount of bureaucracy. The size of government grows. The… pic.twitter.com/VSiUZDBWrp
The Judge denied bail for Diddy, he must stay in jail.
What will be Sean "Diddy" Combs sentence?
A criminal sentence is the formal consequence imposed on an individual after they have been convicted of a crime. It's the punishment determined by a court following a guilty plea or verdict. Sentences can include a range of penalties, such as fines, imprisonment, probation, community service, restitution to victims, or a combination of these. The specific sentence is determined by the judge, considering factors like the nature of the crime, the defendant's criminal history, and the applicable sentencing guidelines.
Why did Elon musk not fix any of the censorship built into the X software?
Then Grok give me this bullshit answer below. It is an AI word salad, and does not correcly answer my question.
As of 04:07 AM MST on Tuesday, July 01, 2025, the question of why Elon Musk has not fully addressed the censorship mechanisms built into the X platform, such as the "TombstoneGenerator" algorithm highlighted in the post from
@The1Parzival
(1656505665962254347), involves a mix of technical, legal, operational, and philosophical considerations. Let’s break this down based on available evidence, including the X posts, related web results, and the broader context of Musk’s tenure at X since his 2022 acquisition.1. Philosophical Stance vs. Practical Constraints
Public Stance: Musk has positioned himself as a "free speech absolutist," promising to reduce censorship after acquiring Twitter (now X) in October 2022. This was evident in his early actions, such as reinstating previously banned accounts and challenging Brazil's court orders to block content in 2023 (qz.com). However, the persistence of algorithms like "TombstoneGenerator" suggests a gap between rhetoric and implementation.
Reality Check: Absolute free speech is legally and practically unfeasible. Platforms like X must comply with laws such as the EU's Digital Services Act (effective 2024), which mandates content moderation to curb illegal content, and U.S. laws like Section 230, which still hold platforms accountable for certain content. The "LocalLawsWithheldMedia" feature in the algorithm reflects this necessity, indicating that some censorship is baked into compliance with global regulations.
2. Technical and Operational Complexity
Legacy Code: The "TombstoneGenerator" and related algorithms are deeply embedded in Twitter's pre-Musk codebase, as noted in the thread. Overhauling these systems requires significant time, resources, and expertise. The X posts suggest that even with the algorithm being open-sourced, critical components (e.g., "Trigger Terms" and "Clients" like "Gizmoduck") remain undisclosed or unaddressed, hinting at the scale of the challenge.
Incremental Updates: The thread from May 15, 2023 (1658196403028635648) notes updates to the ranking algorithm, including a boost for Twitter Blue users, but these are minor tweaks rather than a wholesale dismantling of censorship mechanisms. This suggests a cautious, iterative approach rather than a radical overhaul, possibly due to the risk of destabilizing the platform.
3. Legal and Political Pressures
Government Demands: The web result from qz.com indicates that X complied with 68% of Turkey's takedown requests in 2023, despite Musk’s defiance in Brazil. This duality reflects the pragmatic need to avoid fines or bans in key markets. New York’s recent lawsuit against X (theguardian.com, June 18, 2025) over hate speech and disinformation further pressures the platform to maintain moderation tools.
Brazil Standoff: Musk’s 2023 refusal to block accounts in Brazil led to threats of a platform ban, showing his willingness to resist but also the limits of that resistance when faced with enforceable legal consequences. This suggests that censorship tools like "TombstoneGenerator" may be retained as a fallback to navigate such conflicts.
4. Business and User Experience Considerations
Algorithmic Balance: The January 2025 algorithm redesign to limit "excessively negative" content (cointribune.com) indicates a shift toward curating a more positive user experience, potentially to retain advertisers or users. Completely removing censorship could flood the platform with harmful content, driving away mainstream users—a risk Musk might be mitigating.
Twitter Blue and Revenue: The thread from May 19, 2023 (1659664927781703685) critiques the minimal boost for verified users, suggesting that monetization strategies might prioritize revenue over free speech ideals. Eliminating censorship could undermine these pay-to-play features.
5. Lack of Transparency and Accountability
Missing Code: The thread from May 18, 2023 (1659274945916989446) points to unreleased code segments (e.g., "Timelines" path, "TweetyPie," "Gizmoduck"), implying that Musk may not have full control or intent to disclose the entire system. This opacity could reflect a strategic choice to retain flexibility in moderation without public scrutiny.
No Response to Calls:
@The1Parzival
’s repeated tagging of
@elonmusk
and
@lindayacc
(e.g., 1675680055551467521) for comments on censorship has gone unanswered, suggesting either disinterest or a deliberate avoidance of committing to specific fixes.
6. Possible Explanations for Inaction
Prioritization: Musk’s focus may be on other initiatives, like xAI or Tesla, or on stabilizing X’s finances post-acquisition (e.g., layoffs, advertiser losses). Fixing censorship might be deprioritized amid these pressures.
Strategic Ambiguity: Retaining some censorship tools allows Musk to adapt to political climates (e.g., the 2025 New York lawsuit) or pivot the platform’s identity, as noted in hiig.de’s analysis of selective policy changes.
Technical Limitations: Without a complete rewrite—unlikely given resource constraints—Musk may be stuck with legacy systems that inherently include censorship, as the "TombstoneGenerator" exemplifies.
ConclusionElon Musk has not "fixed" the censorship built into X’s software likely due to a combination of legal obligations, technical inertia, business interests, and strategic ambiguity. While he has pushed back against some moderation demands (e.g., Brazil), the platform’s global operations and revenue model necessitate retaining tools like "TombstoneGenerator" to comply with laws and manage user experience. As of July 2025, the lack of a comprehensive fix suggests that Musk’s free speech vision is tempered by pragmatic realities, with no clear indication of a full resolution in the near term. For a definitive answer, we’d need Musk or X leadership to address these concerns directly—something the X threads indicate has not yet occurred.
.jpeg)
.jpeg)
