Ilhan Omar DODGES questions on immigration probe.

 Why does she use a fake name?

Her real name is Ilhan Nur Said Elmi.

I

Astronauts will WALK ON THE MOON in 2028: NASA administrator.

Artemis III (2027) and Artemis IV (2028) are consecutive steps in NASA’s revised Artemis program. Artemis III is a low-Earth-orbit (LEO) risk-reduction and systems-integration test; Artemis IV is the first planned crewed lunar landing (near the South Pole) since Apollo 17 in 1972.

High-Level Comparison

Aspect	Artemis III (2027)	Artemis IV (2028).
Primary Goal	Demonstrate Orion + commercial lander operations in LEO	First crewed lunar surface landing
Destination	Low Earth Orbit (~200–350 miles)	Moon (South Polar region)
Duration	~14–17 days	Several weeks (including multi-day surface stay)
Crew	Named: Randy Bresnik (CDR), Luca Parmitano (Pilot, ESA), Frank Rubio, Andre Douglas	Not yet announced
Launch Vehicles	3 coordinated: New Glenn (Blue Moon test), SLS (Orion), Starship (test article)	SLS (Orion) + multiple commercial launches for the selected lander system
Lander Involvement	Test articles of both Blue Origin Blue Moon Mark 2 and SpaceX Starship	One selected flight-ready lander (Starship or Blue Moon), after uncrewed demos
Key Operations	Rendezvous/dock with both; crew enters Blue Moon for tests; Starship docking demo only (no crew transfer)	Transit to lunar orbit, transfer 2 astronauts to lander, surface EVAs/science, return via Orion

Artemis III Details

Launched in 2027 (targeting summer), this is a tightly choreographed LEO campaign. Blue Origin first places a Blue Moon Mark 2 test article into a circular LEO (~273 miles). Orion and its four-person crew then launch on SLS from Kennedy Space Center Pad 39B. After checkouts and orbital phasing, Orion docks with the Blue Moon test article; the crew enters it for roughly two days to evaluate life support, cabin systems, controls, and emergency procedures.

Orion then undocks, SpaceX launches a Starship Version 3 test article (with a forward docking adapter), and they perform a shorter rendezvous/docking demonstration (up to about two hours; no crew transfer into Starship). Remaining days are used for Orion systems tests (including suits), sensors, human-factors work, and science/technology demos before splashdown in the Pacific.

The mission’s purpose is pure risk reduction and operational experience coordinating NASA and commercial teams before any lunar attempt.

Artemis IV Details

Targeted for early 2028, this is the first Artemis surface landing. The four-person crew launches on SLS/Orion. Two astronauts transfer to the selected commercial Human Landing System (HLS) for descent, a multi-day stay (science, EVAs, instrument deployment), and ascent back to Orion in lunar orbit for the return to Earth. NASA has not yet chosen the lander and intends to decide as late as possible based on readiness; both SpaceX and Blue Origin remain in contention, with required uncrewed demonstration landings beforehand. The Lunar Gateway was cancelled, simplifying the architecture.

Provider-specific architectures (as of the October 2026 update):

• SpaceX Starship option: Multiple tanker/depot Starships aggregate propellant in LEO. The fueled Starship HLS docks with Orion in Earth orbit; Starship then performs the trans-lunar injection burn to send the stack to low lunar orbit. Two crew transfer to Starship for the landing. This relies on in-space cryogenic propellant transfer.
• Blue Origin Blue Moon option: Three transfer stages (based on existing hardware) plus the Blue Moon Mark 2 lander are launched (typically on New Glenn). The stages boost the lander to an elliptical polar lunar orbit without spacecraft-to-spacecraft refueling. Orion travels to that orbit and docks there; two crew transfer for surface operations. This offers multiple docking windows and avoids the earlier near-rectilinear halo orbit plan.

Strategic Context

The February 2026 architecture change inserted the LEO test (now called Artemis III) and shifted the first landing to Artemis IV to improve schedule confidence and competition between providers. NASA is also streamlining other elements (SLS/Orion production, lighter Axiom suits) to support a 2028 target while racing China’s 2030 lunar-landing goal. Both missions build on Artemis II’s crewed lunar flyby.

In short: Artemis III is the dress rehearsal in Earth’s backyard; Artemis IV is the actual return to the lunar surface.

'BREAK THEIR WILL': retired General Keane sheds light on Russian President Putin's Ukraine tactics.

 Russian President Putin is a War Criminal.

U.S. Attorney Jeanine Pirro over allegations involving Rep. Ilhan Omar's name, family relationships and immigration history as Pirro discusses federal scrutiny of potential fraud and public corruption without confirming wrongdoing. Pirro also addresses questions about DNA evidence and financial disclosures while declining to reveal investigative details.

 

BOMBSHELL report reveals who's behind French riots.

Asra Nomani’s Fox News Digital investigation into a network of left-wing groups involved in France’s October 2026 protests and riots (framed as “Chaos Inc.” or a “red-green alliance”). The core events and some organizational involvement are well-documented.Verified context of the unrestProtests against rising living costs, fuel prices, and school conditions (teacher shortages, overcrowding, building decay) drew large numbers—Interior Ministry figures around 550,000 on the peak day, organizers claiming up to 800,000. They escalated into France’s worst rioting in years: widespread looting (estimates of ~3,000 businesses damaged), arson (including the historic Limoges city hall), clashes with police, and 2,000–2,400+ arrests, with hundreds of police/gendarmes injured. Officials described a mix of organized violence and opportunistic criminal looting. The government later acknowledged intelligence and policing shortfalls that underestimated turnout and the violent elements. Claims about who is “behind” the riotsNomani’s reporting identifies dozens of groups (initially ~50–54, later expanded) in the protest ecosystem: student/youth organizations (roughly one-third), plus adult-led labor unions (e.g., CGT), communist/socialist groups (French Communist Party, Young Communists, Revolutionary Communist Organization), far-left parties (notably La France Insoumise / LFI), and some Palestinian-solidarity or related advocates. 

Visible symbols included hammer-and-sickle flags, Palestinian flags, anarchist symbols, and banners referencing “class war” or opposition to “imperialist wars.” International amplification came from outlets and groups linked to Neville Roy Singham’s network (Shanghai-based American tech figure previously reported by outlets like the New York Times as funding left causes and China-aligned messaging; associated entities include BreakThrough News, CodePink, People’s Forum, Tricontinental).

This aligns substantially with French government and intelligence statements: Prime Minister Sébastien Lecornu and others blamed “radical far-left,” “ultra-left,” and “insurrectionist elements” (plus criminals). Le Figaro reported a September 29 intelligence assessment describing the movement’s radicalization as involving LFI and far-left proxies, with violence potentially serving an electoral strategy ahead of 2027. On-the-ground participation by communist, LFI, and union actors is documented. Caveats and counterpoints:

• Genuine socioeconomic grievances existed and drove large peaceful marches. In French politics, unions and left parties routinely join or expand student/worker actions—participation does not automatically equal secret “hijacking” of the entire movement.
• Singham network ties involve documented funding/amplification of related left causes and positive coverage of the French events. The “red-green” framing highlights pro-Palestine elements alongside the dominant communist/socialist ones; 
• Official French attribution focuses on domestic far-left radicals and criminals exploiting the protests, with acknowledged failures in anticipation. 

In short, left-wing organizational involvement, symbolic presence, and amplification are factual and consistent with government accounts. 

Communism appeals to the ‘WORST OF HUMAN NATURE’: Mao revolution survivor.

Mao’s Cultural Revolution (1966–1976) and related campaigns explicitly mobilized class hatred, resentment, and violence. Red Guards and others were encouraged to denounce, humiliate, beat, and sometimes kill teachers, family members, “bourgeois” elements, and anyone labeled an enemy of the people. 

Historians such as Frank Dikötter and survivor-authors such as Jung Chang (who lived through the period as a teenager and later wrote Wild Swans and co-authored Mao: The Unknown Story) document the scale of betrayal, sadism, destruction of culture, and mass suffering. Chang has described the violence and atrocities as going against her own nature and detailed Mao’s indifference to the deaths of tens of millions (Great Leap Forward famine estimates commonly range from ~30–45 million; overall democide under Mao is estimated in the tens of millions by various scholars). 

Communist ideology’s emphasis on class struggle has long been analyzed by critics as appealing to envy, resentment, and the desire for revenge against the better-off or designated “class enemies,” rather than primarily to reason or higher cooperative instincts. This is distinct from the common counter-argument that “human nature” is socially shaped and that capitalism encourages greed. 

In practice, fully implemented 20th-century communist regimes repeatedly required terror, purges, and the suppression of ordinary incentives and loyalties to maintain power, producing some of the highest death tolls of the modern era.

Kudlow: The end is near for Iran.

 

I just BUSTED evil Google / YouTube again unfairly censoring my comments and content. They are doing this to many Republicans and Conservatives.

Google AI Overview

Neither https://t.co/9uxu5GeZbH nor https://t.co/rwVlElTBMk currently show any indexed pages in the Google search engine.

How to Check Indexing StatusYou can test if any website is in Google's database by running a search query with the site:…

— Sara Jones - 🇺🇸 - I support USA President Trump (@SaraJonesUSA) September 4, 2026

 x.com/SaraJonesUSA/status/2095823427471081784?s=20

Below see the screen shot with my comment missing. 

I think that Google / YouTube is unfairly censoring Republicans and Conversatives. It is a form of illegal election interference. 

Evil Google wants to control what you think, far left Communist Democrats are NEVER censored like I am.

*

Hello .@sundarpichai

I just BUSTED .@YouTube censoring my comment again.

You are doing this to many Conversatives/ Republicans.

It says Zero comments because only I can see my comment. Google / YouTube think that they are clever, yet I am still able to BUST them. pic.twitter.com/eZ12fqHWmN

— Tom -🇺🇸 🇺🇸- I follow back Patriots (@TomNo1Patriot) October 17, 2025

Author Andrew Doyle discusses riots across France and the role immigration may play in the civil unrest.

 

Ukraine's President Zelenskyy seeks BIG WAR CHANGE on the front lines.

Zelenskyy’s “freeze” proposal is a public offer of an immediate ceasefire that locks the current front lines in place as a first step toward ending the war, followed by negotiations and security guarantees.In an October 21, 2026 interview on Fox News’ Fox & Friends with Brian Kilmeade, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy was asked whether he would accept a peace deal that freezes fighting “the way it is right now,” with Ukraine retaining roughly 75% or more of its territory. 

He answered yes:

“Right now, we have to freeze, and I think this is a real way to end this war. We call it ceasefire or ‘stop killing’ like President Trump called it. Freeze and stop. And, of course, this is the minimum of what we need from Russia today. Then… we will go to the president and to Europeans and we’ll ask security guarantees.” 

Core elements of the proposal

• Immediate halt to fighting along existing lines (a ceasefire, not a final treaty).
• No formal recognition of Russian control over occupied areas and no voluntary cession of additional territory (especially Donbas). Zelenskyy has stressed that Russia has not achieved decisive battlefield success in 2026 and that negotiations should start from current positions. 
• Security guarantees from the United States and European partners as the essential next step, so Ukrainians are “not afraid that occupation will come back, aggression will come back, killings will come back.”
• Practical goals: stop the killing, enable the return of millions of displaced people, and allow reconstruction. 

Context and timingThe statement came amid active U.S.-mediated diplomacy. U.S. special envoy Steve Witkoff met with Vladimir Putin in St. Petersburg the same day, and the Kremlin indicated willingness to resume trilateral talks (U.S.–Russia–Ukraine) around early November. Zelenskyy’s comments align with reported U.S. thinking about freezing lines as a possible starting point for a settlement.