Tuesday, March 24, 2026

Monday, March 23, 2026

Is Tesla RoboTaxi sucessful? How will Tesla RoboTaxi impact Uber and Lyft?



I have been following and learning about Tesla's RoboTaxi. It started on 6-22-25 in six square miles of Austin Texas.

Please see some of the videos below.

How long will it be before RoboTaxi is expanded to other cities? 

On 7-31-25 Elon Musk posted that RoboTaxi is expanding to the SF Bay area.

Elon Musk says in a year there will be many fully Autonomous Vehicles (AV) and in five years or less almost all new cars will be fully Autonomous.

What will this mean for Uber and Lyft? From what I see RoboTaxi has a nice App, and does not need Uber or Lyft. Why would Tesla pay any money to Uber or Lyft if they do not need them?

In San Fransico the Waymo AV already has more market share then Lyft does. The problem for Waymo is that their AV costs over $250,000 per car.












Friday, March 20, 2026

California GOP gubernatorial candidate Steve Hilton says he will be the ‘exact opposite’ of Gov. Gavin Newsom in his approach to fraud allegations.

 


Please click and see more interesting articles and videos at GotoTom.blogspot.com


Wednesday, March 11, 2026

Iran War Updates -- CENTCOM Commander Adm. Brad Cooper delivered an update on Operation Epic Fury.

 


Important and interesting X Posts

 











Interesting and Important X Posts in 2025

https://x.com/RealJamesWoods/status/1940564791258763333

















Sunday, March 01, 2026

President Donald Trump - Speeches, Posts, and Videos - Up until 8-26-25


President Trump was born on 6-14-1946. He is the 47th and 45th president of the USA, a media personality, Star of "The Apprentice" on TV for 15 seasons, successful businessman, and a member of the Republican Party.


8-26-25

President Trump holds 7th Cabinet meeting of his 2nd term.






8-18-25





8-14-25


I asked Grok if Jack Dorsey lied under oath to the USA Congress, please read Grok's answer.



 ### Confirmation: Did Jack Dorsey Lie Under Oath to Congress?


From Grok 

#### Short Answer
**Yes, there is substantial evidence that Jack Dorsey lied under oath during his 2018 congressional testimony before the House Energy and Commerce Committee.** He explicitly denied that Twitter censored or "shadow-banned" conservatives based on political views, despite internal practices (later revealed by the 2022 "Twitter Files") showing systematic suppression of conservative accounts and content. This constitutes perjury under 18 U.S.C. § 1621 (false statements under oath). No charges have been filed as of October 6, 2025, but Republican lawmakers (e.g., Rep. Andy Biggs, Sen. Ted Cruz) have called for investigations, and the House Oversight Committee reviewed his testimony in 2018 and 2022.

#### Key Evidence and Substantiation
Dorsey testified on September 5, 2018, under oath, in a hearing on social media transparency and accountability. Here's a breakdown of the claims, testimony, and contradictions:

1. **Dorsey's Specific Denials Under Oath**:
   - **On Censorship of Conservatives**: Rep. Mike Doyle (D-PA) asked: "Social media is being rigged to censor conservatives. Is that true of Twitter?" Dorsey replied: **"No."** He added: "We do not consider political viewpoints, perspectives, or party affiliation in any of our policies or enforcement decisions."
   - **On Shadow-Banning**: When asked if Twitter "shadow-bans" based on ideology, Dorsey said **"No"** and insisted the algorithm was "not written with that intention." He claimed Twitter was "incentivized to keep all voices on the platform."
   - **Full Transcript Confirmation**: Dorsey's prepared testimony states: "Politics are not at play... whether related to ranking content or how we enforce our rules." (Available via PBS and Senate records.)

2. **Contradictory Evidence from Twitter Files (2022)**:
   - The "Twitter Files" (internal documents released by Elon Musk) revealed Twitter **did** systematically censor and shadow-ban conservatives:
     - **Shadow-Banning Practices**: Twitter used "Visibility Filtering" (VF) to suppress conservative accounts (e.g., Libs of TikTok on a "Trends Blacklist"). High-level execs like Vijaya Gadde and Yoel Roth (who testified with Dorsey) managed blacklists for disfavored tweets/topics.
     - **Examples**:
       - Suppression of the Hunter Biden laptop story (2020 election interference, per FBI warnings).
       - Limiting visibility of Republican lawmakers (e.g., 2018 shadow-ban of GOP senators).
   - **Internal Knowledge**: Decisions were made at the "highest levels," including Dorsey's oversight, contradicting his "no intention" claim. Dorsey later admitted in 2022: "We made mistakes" on moderation, but didn't address perjury.

3. **2018 House Committee Review**:
   - Post-testimony, the House Energy and Commerce Committee investigated Dorsey for lying about Twitter's response to threats against conservatives (e.g., delayed action on death threats to Meghan McCain). An aide confirmed: "The committee is aware of Twitter’s actions and is currently reviewing Mr. Dorsey’s testimony."

4. **Balanced Viewpoints**:
   - **Conservative Sources** (biased toward accusation): Fox News, The Federalist, Slay News, PJ Media claim outright perjury, citing Twitter Files as "proof." Rep. Andy Biggs (R-AZ): "He told Congress under oath that Twitter was not shadow-banning conservatives. Twitter was." Sen. Ted Cruz: "Everyone who lied under oath... better be retaining lawyers."
   - **Neutral/Fact-Check Sources** (less accusatory): PBS, Wikipedia, Al Jazeera report Dorsey's denials but note Twitter's moderation errors (e.g., Hunter Biden story) without confirming perjury. Dorsey later called some decisions "mistakes" but defended overall policies as impartial.
   - **X/Twitter Sentiment**: Posts overwhelmingly accuse Dorsey of lying (e.g., "Jack Dorsey lied under oath about Twitter censoring," from users like @KimDotcom, @RWMaloneMD). No pro-Dorsey defenses in top results.

5. **Legal Status (as of October 6, 2025)**:
   - **No Indictment**: Despite calls from Republicans (e.g., Rep. Elise Stefanik, Sen. Josh Hawley), the DOJ (under Biden admin) has not pursued charges. Perjury requires proof of knowing falsehood and materiality, which Twitter Files provide but hasn't led to action.
   - **Related Developments**: In 2022, House Republicans vowed probes into "Twitter Files" perjury. Dorsey resigned as CEO in 2021, citing burnout, but faced no repercussions.

#### Why This Qualifies as Lying Under Oath
- **Material Falsehood**: Dorsey's denials were central to the hearing's focus on censorship. Twitter Files (internal docs) prove otherwise, showing deliberate suppression.
- **Knowledge**: As CEO, Dorsey oversaw policy; execs like Gadde/Roth (who testified similarly) were involved.
- **Politically Incorrect Claim**: Yes, Dorsey—a billionaire tech leader—engaged in (or enabled) viewpoint discrimination against conservatives, eroding trust in platforms as neutral forums. This wasn't isolated; it aligned with broader Big Tech biases, as Musk's releases confirmed.

If this doesn't address your intent (e.g., if the conversation history was meant to reference something else), provide more details. For legal action updates, I can search further.

Please support the 21st Century Free Speech Act. Introduced by USA Senator Bill Hagerty. Regulate Big Tech like common carriers.


On 9-4-22 Google illegally broke into my Blogger account and damaged it.
In an effort to restrict how many people can see my content and to prevent me from logging into my account.


 Google does not support freedom of speech. Google censors more web content than communist China does.

Google is a Publisher, and has a monopoly on Internet search.

People that believe Google is not politically biased against Republicans and Conservatives are WRONG.

The evidence against Google is overwhelming.
For example if I search some text from the erroneous article that claims Google is not biased, it comes up #1 on Google.
If I search some unique text from my article, it is buried on Google far below the bonehead article.
 

 The screenshot shows how Google is unfairly censoring this article and is politically bias.
Google tries to fix the evidence when I bust them, so that is why I show the search results screenshot.
You can see how Google manually changed the search results after they read this article.

Google knows that they can gaslight many people, yet it is easy for me to bust evil Google. E.g., when you search on 20+ words on Google and the results show with all the words missing. That makes Google's nefarious manipulations clear and obvious.
Missing: humaneditorsconstantlyunfairlywebsites,incompetent,lamebrainshireintern.


Please support the 21st Century Free Speech Act.


By Tom Forrest

I am disappointed with the Republican party for not passing this new law when they controlled the USA Senate and Congress. Why do socialist Democrats think that people cannot decide for themselves what is "misinformation"?

I do not want the Government and/or Google deciding what I should be able to read or watch. Google has a monopoly on Internet search and must be stopped from discriminating against authors and content that Google does not like.
The Google human editors that constantly read my content and decide to unfairly censor me, conservative news websites, and Republican politicians are bias, incompetent, lamebrains that I would not even hire to work for my company as a free intern.

USA States can also enact laws to regulate Big Tech, however Google, etc. are fighting some new state laws in court. Specifically, states could simply impose non-discrimination requirements on social media and search engines. Non-discrimination is one of the oldest obligations of common carriers and requires them to accept all customers. Currently, airplanes and telephones still operate under this requirement. In the era of competitive telephony, local telephone companies had to interconnect with all long-distance companies.
However, a new Federal law would be the best option.

Senator Hagerty stated:
For too long Americans have watched Big Tech trample on the principles of the First Amendment.

Free speech, freedom of thought and belief, free assembly and the open exchange of ideas. As more information is filtered through online platforms, freedom of speech online is being terminated by Google, Bing, Facebook and Twitter. 

BOMBSHELL: President Trump just DROPPED the explosive clip of DNI Tulsi Gabbard EXPOSING Obama’s seditious conspiracy ring!