How many people is Google censoring? Google is censoring 98% of my content. Elon Musk never fixed any of the evil censorship that Jack Dorsey and his team built into the X software. We do not have online freedom of speech.
Thursday, October 29, 2026
BREAKING: New economic numbers give GOP 'MAJOR' midterm boost.
JUST IN: USA Vice President Vance sends letter to Iranian hardliner ahead of possible strikes.
I want the USA to finish the job.
That means destroying Iran and putting in new Iranian leadership.
It is a waste of time to try to negotiate with the current hardline leaders in Iran.
Wednesday, October 28, 2026
JUST IN: USA reportedly warns Gulf allies on NEW Iran strikes.
The USA Gulf military strategy in late 2026 centers on sustaining pressure on Iran through a naval blockade of Iranian ports, freedom-of-navigation operations in the Strait of Hormuz, selective strikes to degrade Iranian reconstitution, and readiness for a potential short, high-intensity campaign after the November 3 midterm elections—while reducing exposure of fixed bases and coordinating with Gulf partners.
The conflict framework traces to Operation Epic Fury (US-Israeli strikes starting late February 2026), followed by an April ceasefire that gave way to a US naval blockade of Iranian ports and ongoing Iranian asymmetric attacks on shipping and regional infrastructure. CENTCOM has focused on escorting commercial traffic, clearing mines from main shipping lanes, and limited strikes on coastal radars, missile launchers, and related assets. Reports indicate oil flows through Hormuz have recovered toward substantial fractions of pre-war levels under US and partner efforts, even as Iranian attacks on vessels have continued at elevated rates in October.
Core pillars of the strategy
- Economic and naval coercion: Maintain the blockade of Iranian ports while protecting other Gulf oil and LNG exports. This imposes costs on Tehran without requiring large-scale ground operations. CENTCOM has reported assisting the transit of large volumes of oil and thousands of commercial vessels.
- Deterrence and selective degradation: Intermittent strikes to prevent Iran from fully reconstituting anti-ship, drone, and missile capabilities along the coast. Planning for a potential “short, intense” post-midterms wave of strikes targets nuclear facilities, energy infrastructure, missile/drone arsenals, and related sites, aimed at further weakening Iran and improving US leverage for negotiations. US forces are restocking munitions, positioning additional Patriots, and preparing air assets; a third carrier strike group and Marine expeditionary unit are moving into or toward the theater.
- Force protection and posture adjustment: Troops and non-essential personnel have been shifted from more exposed bases (including in Qatar, Kuwait, and Saudi Arabia) amid Iranian threats of retaliation against US installations, energy sites, data centers, and infrastructure in Gulf states. Discussions in defense circles address whether to rebuild concentrated hubs (such as facilities at Al Udeid) or move toward more distributed, rotational, and access-oriented arrangements to reduce vulnerability to cheap drones and missiles while retaining rapid reinforcement options.
- Allied coordination: Diplomatic and military channels have been used to alert Gulf partners of possible escalation after the midterms. Joint actions with partners (for example, against Iran-linked threats in Iraq) and ongoing support for energy-site defenses form part of the approach. Gulf states host significant US presence but have incentives to avoid becoming primary targets of Iranian retaliation.
Land-based air and missile defenses are being reinforced. Constraints include prior depletion of interceptors (Patriot and THAAD stocks), damage to some fixed installations earlier in the conflict, host-nation political sensitivities, and the broader USA preference (reflected in recent strategy documents) for avoiding an open-ended large permanent footprint while prioritizing other theaters.
Iran’s strategy relies on asymmetric tools (missiles, drones, mines, small boats) to threaten shipping and Gulf infrastructure, raise economic costs, and complicate US basing.
Tehran has publicly conditioned de-escalation on sanctions relief, ending the blockade, and assurances against further strikes.Implications and open questions
I just BUSTED evil Google / YouTube again unfairly censoring my comments and content. They are doing this to many Republicans and Conservatives.
Google AI Overview
— Sara Jones - 🇺🇸 - I support USA President Trump (@SaraJonesUSA) September 4, 2026
Neither https://t.co/9uxu5GeZbH nor https://t.co/rwVlElTBMk currently show any indexed pages in the Google search engine.
How to Check Indexing StatusYou can test if any website is in Google's database by running a search query with the site:…
x.com/SaraJonesUSA/status/2095823427471081784?s=20
Below see the screen shot with my comment missing.
I think that Google / YouTube is unfairly censoring Republicans and Conversatives. It is a form of illegal election interference.
Evil Google wants to control what you think, far left Communist Democrats are NEVER censored like I am.
*
— Tom -🇺🇸 🇺🇸- I follow back Patriots (@TomNo1Patriot) October 17, 2025
Hello .@sundarpichai
I just BUSTED .@YouTube censoring my comment again.
You are doing this to many Conversatives/ Republicans.
It says Zero comments because only I can see my comment. Google / YouTube think that they are clever, yet I am still able to BUST them. pic.twitter.com/eZ12fqHWmN
Tuesday, October 27, 2026
AFFORDABILITY MYTH? Baier CONFRONTS President Trump’s TRILLION-DOLLAR claim.
Bret Baier (Fox News Special Report host) has pressed USA President Trump and administration officials on several large economic claims, particularly massive investment figures and affordability-related promises, even while working at a network generally supportive of Trump.Investment claims (“trillion-dollar” figures)Trump has repeatedly told Baier and others that his policies have brought in $17–22 trillion in new investments (the number has fluctuated). In interviews with Baier, Trump has stated figures such as “$17 trillion of investment coming into our country” and later “$18 trillion in 11 months.” When Baier asked Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent for a concrete total of the investments, trade deals, corporate commitments, and tariff revenue, Bessent replied that “the president uses the number ‘20 trillion’ in terms of total investments, and I think that those commitments are real,” while citing examples such as deals with Japan, South Korea, and Apple. He did not provide an independent verified total.
Independent reviews (including analyses of the White House’s own investment tracker) have found the administration’s listed commitments substantially lower than Trump’s headline figures—often in the $7–11 trillion range after excluding vague pledges, non-investment trade goals, or items announced under prior administrations—though the administration maintains the commitments are real and unprecedented. $5,000 “dividend” / tariff rebate claimAfter Trump pledged a $5,000 dividend to every adult American if Republicans hold Congress (estimated cost roughly $1.25–1.35 trillion), Baier raised the figure on air and pressed Vice President JD Vance. He noted that critics would call it “bribing voters” and questioned whether it would worsen the deficit/debt and bring back inflation. Vance defended it as sharing the benefits of the economic strength created by the administration’s policies. Baier has also questioned whether smaller proposed tariff rebate checks (e.g., $2,000) would be inflationary.
“We will not let the Communist Party of China define who we are,” says Taiwan’s Vice President Hsiao Bi-Khim, who has been sanctioned by Beijing and labeled a “separatist.”
The cross-strait situation refers to the unresolved political and military dispute between the People’s Republic of China (PRC, based in Beijing) and Taiwan (officially the Republic of China, or ROC). Beijing claims Taiwan as an inalienable part of its territory and seeks eventual unification; Taiwan operates as a self-governing democracy that has never been ruled by the PRC.After the Chinese Civil War, the ROC government retreated to Taiwan in 1949 while the Communist Party established the PRC on the mainland.
The two sides have remained separate ever since, with no peace treaty. The PRC’s official position is the “One China Principle”: there is only one China, Taiwan is part of it, and the PRC is its sole legal government. It prefers “peaceful reunification” under a “one country, two systems” formula but has not renounced the use of force. Taiwan’s government rejects subordination to Beijing. Public opinion on the island has shifted strongly toward a distinct Taiwanese identity; most people favor maintaining the status quo rather than formal independence or unification.The United States follows its own “One China policy,” which acknowledges Beijing’s claim without endorsing it.
Under the Taiwan Relations Act, the U.S. provides defensive arms to Taiwan and maintains “strategic ambiguity” about whether it would intervene militarily if the island were attacked. Taiwan has formal diplomatic relations with only a small number of countries; most of the world, including the United States, recognizes the PRC while conducting unofficial ties with Taipei.Since the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) returned to power, tensions have risen. President Lai Ching-te and Vice President Hsiao Bi-khim have emphasized Taiwan’s separate democratic identity and closer security cooperation with the United States and other partners.
Beijing has responded with sanctions on Taiwanese officials (including Hsiao, whom it labels a “diehard separatist”), large-scale military exercises, frequent air and naval incursions near the island, economic pressure, and efforts to peel away Taiwan’s remaining diplomatic allies. These are often described as “gray zone” tactics short of open war. Taiwan has increased defense spending and pursued “asymmetric” capabilities aimed at raising the cost of any invasion, while also seeking to diversify its economy away from heavy reliance on the mainland.
The core disagreement remains status: Beijing treats any move toward formal independence or permanent separation as a red line, while Taiwan’s elected leaders and much of its public reject being defined or absorbed by the Chinese Communist Party. No near-term resolution is in sight, and the risk of miscalculation around the Taiwan Strait is widely viewed as one of the more serious flashpoints in the Indo-Pacific.
Nobody taking away our right to vote, wake up black people, he's talking about illegal migrants, they don't have ID, that's their new voting base.
This woman wins the internet today 🔥
— @Chicago1Ray 🇺🇸 (@Chicago1Ray) February 6, 2026
This is where my righteous anger pops up, bc know what he saying is a lie bc I live in the south and when I go to vote, every single time there's an election, and guess what, I show my ID, I write my signature, they check to see who I am… pic.twitter.com/g1iIWTQu4a
This is where my righteous anger pops up, bc know what he saying is a lie bc I live in the south and when I go to vote, every single time there's an election, and guess what, I show my ID, I write my signature, they check to see who I am. Nobody asking me to count any jellybeans in the jar, and quit lumping us in the people of color category. Nobody taking away our right to vote, wake up black people, he's talking about illegal migrants, they don't have ID, that's their new voting base. I've been having ID since I was 15 years old, I'm 50 years old, every black person i know has ID. You need an ID to buy liquor, cigarettes, get on a plane, go to a club, even the homeless guy i just gave $5 dollars had an ID to go get his liquor. Wait till the end when she talks about her marriage license... this lady nails it.
Monday, October 26, 2026
President Donald Trump's criticism of the Obama Iran nuclear deal and Elon Musk's restriction of Ukraine's military access to Starlink satellite services.
Obama is full of Shit.
Iran thinks that Obama is a Sucker.
Sunday, October 25, 2026
Communism appeals to the ‘WORST OF HUMAN NATURE’: Mao revolution survivor.
Mao’s Cultural Revolution (1966–1976) and related campaigns explicitly mobilized class hatred, resentment, and violence. Red Guards and others were encouraged to denounce, humiliate, beat, and sometimes kill teachers, family members, “bourgeois” elements, and anyone labeled an enemy of the people.
Historians such as Frank Dikötter and survivor-authors such as Jung Chang (who lived through the period as a teenager and later wrote Wild Swans and co-authored Mao: The Unknown Story) document the scale of betrayal, sadism, destruction of culture, and mass suffering. Chang has described the violence and atrocities as going against her own nature and detailed Mao’s indifference to the deaths of tens of millions (Great Leap Forward famine estimates commonly range from ~30–45 million; overall democide under Mao is estimated in the tens of millions by various scholars).
Communist ideology’s emphasis on class struggle has long been analyzed by critics as appealing to envy, resentment, and the desire for revenge against the better-off or designated “class enemies,” rather than primarily to reason or higher cooperative instincts. This is distinct from the common counter-argument that “human nature” is socially shaped and that capitalism encourages greed.
In practice, fully implemented 20th-century communist regimes repeatedly required terror, purges, and the suppression of ordinary incentives and loyalties to maintain power, producing some of the highest death tolls of the modern era.
Saturday, October 24, 2026
Marco Rubio calls on Cuba dissidents to PARTNER with CIA.
Ilhan Omar DODGES questions on immigration probe.
Why does she use a fake name?
Her real name is Ilhan Nur Said Elmi.
I
Astronauts will WALK ON THE MOON in 2028: NASA administrator.
Artemis III (2027) and Artemis IV (2028) are consecutive steps in NASA’s revised Artemis program. Artemis III is a low-Earth-orbit (LEO) risk-reduction and systems-integration test; Artemis IV is the first planned crewed lunar landing (near the South Pole) since Apollo 17 in 1972.
High-Level Comparison
| Aspect | Artemis III (2027) | Artemis IV (2028). |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Goal | Demonstrate Orion + commercial lander operations in LEO | First crewed lunar surface landing |
| Destination | Low Earth Orbit (~200–350 miles) | Moon (South Polar region) |
| Duration | ~14–17 days | Several weeks (including multi-day surface stay) |
| Crew | Named: Randy Bresnik (CDR), Luca Parmitano (Pilot, ESA), Frank Rubio, Andre Douglas | Not yet announced |
| Launch Vehicles | 3 coordinated: New Glenn (Blue Moon test), SLS (Orion), Starship (test article) | SLS (Orion) + multiple commercial launches for the selected lander system |
| Lander Involvement | Test articles of both Blue Origin Blue Moon Mark 2 and SpaceX Starship | One selected flight-ready lander (Starship or Blue Moon), after uncrewed demos |
| Key Operations | Rendezvous/dock with both; crew enters Blue Moon for tests; Starship docking demo only (no crew transfer) | Transit to lunar orbit, transfer 2 astronauts to lander, surface EVAs/science, return via Orion |
Artemis III Details
Launched in 2027 (targeting summer), this is a tightly choreographed LEO campaign. Blue Origin first places a Blue Moon Mark 2 test article into a circular LEO (~273 miles). Orion and its four-person crew then launch on SLS from Kennedy Space Center Pad 39B. After checkouts and orbital phasing, Orion docks with the Blue Moon test article; the crew enters it for roughly two days to evaluate life support, cabin systems, controls, and emergency procedures.
Orion then undocks, SpaceX launches a Starship Version 3 test article (with a forward docking adapter), and they perform a shorter rendezvous/docking demonstration (up to about two hours; no crew transfer into Starship). Remaining days are used for Orion systems tests (including suits), sensors, human-factors work, and science/technology demos before splashdown in the Pacific.
The mission’s purpose is pure risk reduction and operational experience coordinating NASA and commercial teams before any lunar attempt.
Artemis IV Details
Targeted for early 2028, this is the first Artemis surface landing. The four-person crew launches on SLS/Orion. Two astronauts transfer to the selected commercial Human Landing System (HLS) for descent, a multi-day stay (science, EVAs, instrument deployment), and ascent back to Orion in lunar orbit for the return to Earth. NASA has not yet chosen the lander and intends to decide as late as possible based on readiness; both SpaceX and Blue Origin remain in contention, with required uncrewed demonstration landings beforehand. The Lunar Gateway was cancelled, simplifying the architecture.
Provider-specific architectures (as of the October 2026 update):
- SpaceX Starship option: Multiple tanker/depot Starships aggregate propellant in LEO. The fueled Starship HLS docks with Orion in Earth orbit; Starship then performs the trans-lunar injection burn to send the stack to low lunar orbit. Two crew transfer to Starship for the landing. This relies on in-space cryogenic propellant transfer.
- Blue Origin Blue Moon option: Three transfer stages (based on existing hardware) plus the Blue Moon Mark 2 lander are launched (typically on New Glenn). The stages boost the lander to an elliptical polar lunar orbit without spacecraft-to-spacecraft refueling. Orion travels to that orbit and docks there; two crew transfer for surface operations. This offers multiple docking windows and avoids the earlier near-rectilinear halo orbit plan.
Strategic Context
The February 2026 architecture change inserted the LEO test (now called Artemis III) and shifted the first landing to Artemis IV to improve schedule confidence and competition between providers. NASA is also streamlining other elements (SLS/Orion production, lighter Axiom suits) to support a 2028 target while racing China’s 2030 lunar-landing goal. Both missions build on Artemis II’s crewed lunar flyby.
In short: Artemis III is the dress rehearsal in Earth’s backyard; Artemis IV is the actual return to the lunar surface.
Friday, October 23, 2026
'BREAK THEIR WILL': retired General Keane sheds light on Russian President Putin's Ukraine tactics.
Russian President Putin is a War Criminal.
U.S. Attorney Jeanine Pirro over allegations involving Rep. Ilhan Omar's name, family relationships and immigration history as Pirro discusses federal scrutiny of potential fraud and public corruption without confirming wrongdoing. Pirro also addresses questions about DNA evidence and financial disclosures while declining to reveal investigative details.
BOMBSHELL report reveals who's behind French riots.
Asra Nomani’s Fox News Digital investigation into a network of left-wing groups involved in France’s October 2026 protests and riots (framed as “Chaos Inc.” or a “red-green alliance”). The core events and some organizational involvement are well-documented.Verified context of the unrestProtests against rising living costs, fuel prices, and school conditions (teacher shortages, overcrowding, building decay) drew large numbers—Interior Ministry figures around 550,000 on the peak day, organizers claiming up to 800,000. They escalated into France’s worst rioting in years: widespread looting (estimates of ~3,000 businesses damaged), arson (including the historic Limoges city hall), clashes with police, and 2,000–2,400+ arrests, with hundreds of police/gendarmes injured. Officials described a mix of organized violence and opportunistic criminal looting. The government later acknowledged intelligence and policing shortfalls that underestimated turnout and the violent elements. Claims about who is “behind” the riotsNomani’s reporting identifies dozens of groups (initially ~50–54, later expanded) in the protest ecosystem: student/youth organizations (roughly one-third), plus adult-led labor unions (e.g., CGT), communist/socialist groups (French Communist Party, Young Communists, Revolutionary Communist Organization), far-left parties (notably La France Insoumise / LFI), and some Palestinian-solidarity or related advocates.
Visible symbols included hammer-and-sickle flags, Palestinian flags, anarchist symbols, and banners referencing “class war” or opposition to “imperialist wars.” International amplification came from outlets and groups linked to Neville Roy Singham’s network (Shanghai-based American tech figure previously reported by outlets like the New York Times as funding left causes and China-aligned messaging; associated entities include BreakThrough News, CodePink, People’s Forum, Tricontinental).
This aligns substantially with French government and intelligence statements: Prime Minister Sébastien Lecornu and others blamed “radical far-left,” “ultra-left,” and “insurrectionist elements” (plus criminals). Le Figaro reported a September 29 intelligence assessment describing the movement’s radicalization as involving LFI and far-left proxies, with violence potentially serving an electoral strategy ahead of 2027. On-the-ground participation by communist, LFI, and union actors is documented. Caveats and counterpoints:
- Genuine socioeconomic grievances existed and drove large peaceful marches. In French politics, unions and left parties routinely join or expand student/worker actions—participation does not automatically equal secret “hijacking” of the entire movement.
- Singham network ties involve documented funding/amplification of related left causes and positive coverage of the French events. The “red-green” framing highlights pro-Palestine elements alongside the dominant communist/socialist ones;
- Official French attribution focuses on domestic far-left radicals and criminals exploiting the protests, with acknowledged failures in anticipation.
In short, left-wing organizational involvement, symbolic presence, and amplification are factual and consistent with government accounts.
Thursday, October 22, 2026
Wednesday, October 21, 2026
Ukraine's President Zelenskyy seeks BIG WAR CHANGE on the front lines.
Zelenskyy’s “freeze” proposal is a public offer of an immediate ceasefire that locks the current front lines in place as a first step toward ending the war, followed by negotiations and security guarantees.In an October 21, 2026 interview on Fox News’ Fox & Friends with Brian Kilmeade, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy was asked whether he would accept a peace deal that freezes fighting “the way it is right now,” with Ukraine retaining roughly 75% or more of its territory.
He answered yes:
“Right now, we have to freeze, and I think this is a real way to end this war. We call it ceasefire or ‘stop killing’ like President Trump called it. Freeze and stop. And, of course, this is the minimum of what we need from Russia today. Then… we will go to the president and to Europeans and we’ll ask security guarantees.”
Core elements of the proposal- Immediate halt to fighting along existing lines (a ceasefire, not a final treaty).
- No formal recognition of Russian control over occupied areas and no voluntary cession of additional territory (especially Donbas). Zelenskyy has stressed that Russia has not achieved decisive battlefield success in 2026 and that negotiations should start from current positions.
- Security guarantees from the United States and European partners as the essential next step, so Ukrainians are “not afraid that occupation will come back, aggression will come back, killings will come back.”
- Practical goals: stop the killing, enable the return of millions of displaced people, and allow reconstruction.
BREAKING: Russia releases detained American, Steve Wifkoff reveals.
Stephen James Hubbard, a 74-year-old retired American English teacher from Big Rapids, Michigan, was released by Russia on October 21, 2026.
BackgroundHubbard served in the U.S. Air Force and National Guard. He lived and taught English in Japan for about 25 years, later moved to Cyprus, and settled around 2014 in the eastern Ukrainian city of Izium (Izyum) with a Ukrainian partner. He lived on a small pension and did some online teaching. Detention and ChargesRussian forces detained him in April 2022 in Izium, shortly after the full-scale invasion of Ukraine (the city was occupied at the time). Russia accused him of acting as a mercenary: joining a Ukrainian territorial defense unit, receiving training/weapons/ammunition, manning a checkpoint, and being paid roughly $1,000 per month. He was held in multiple facilities, tried in a closed-door Moscow court, and sentenced in October 2024 to six years and 10 months under Russian Criminal Code Article 359. His family and U.S.-based lawyer have denied the charges, stating he was not in any combat or military unit. The U.S. State Department designated him as “wrongfully detained”—he was the only American in Russian custody with that designation at the time of his release. Russia restricted consular access for extended periods. The Release
Tuesday, October 20, 2026
NEW: Ilhan Omar's sister spoke with feds after FBI raid on her house.
Ilhan Omar's older sister, Sahra Noor, voluntarily spoke with federal investigators last week following a Homeland Security Investigations raid on Omar's Washington, D.C. home.
The investigation into Rep. Ilhan Omar remains an active, ongoing federal criminal probe focused on potential immigration fraud involving her family’s paperwork from the 1990s (including possible false statements about age, birth date, or her late father’s background when seeking citizenship or derivative status). No charges or indictments have been filed against Omar or family members as of October 20, 2026. The case is in the pre-indictment evidence-gathering stage before a federal grand jury in Minnesota. Key developments include:
- A court-authorized Homeland Security Investigations search of her D.C. home on October 12, during which agents seized her phone, passport, computers, and other items. A magistrate judge had placed some limits on access to materials due to her status as a member of Congress.
- Subpoenas issued to relatives, including her sister Sahra Noor. Noor voluntarily spoke with investigators last week (the development reported today).
- Collection of DNA samples as part of the inquiry. Sources have indicated investigators are examining longstanding allegations (such as possible false statements on forms) and that one aim could be building a case for denaturalization if fraud is established. Statute-of-limitations issues for older conduct have been noted in reporting.
Omar’s attorneys sent a letter on October 16 accusing the Justice Department of violating the judge’s search protocols, demanding the return of seized property and preservation of any recordings. The DOJ has disputed the letter’s claims and said agents complied with court orders. Omar has denied any wrongdoing and described the probe as politically motivated. Prior reviews of similar issues (including under a previous administration) reportedly found no basis for action. The probe is continuing, with the latest public development being Noor’s voluntary interview.
Monday, October 19, 2026
French riots send WARNING to USA as 1,800 arrested, city hall TORCHED.
France is dealing with the aftermath of its worst urban unrest in years, which erupted over the weekend.
On Saturday, October 17, nationwide protests over the cost of living, rising prices, declining public services, and school conditions drew an estimated 550,000 people (authorities’ figure; organizers cited higher numbers around 800,000). The marches, building on a month of student protests and involving unions and others, largely began peacefully but escalated into widespread rioting, looting, arson, and clashes in multiple cities including Paris, Marseille, Lyon, and Limoges.
The most striking damage was in Limoges, where a 19th-century neo-Renaissance town hall was set ablaze by masked groups; the roof and spire collapsed, and the building was largely destroyed—a “heritage catastrophe,” according to local officials. Hundreds of shops were looted or damaged, vehicles and barricades burned, and other public buildings (including a tourist office in Lyon) were attacked. Police reported nearly 2,400 arrests and close to 1,000 officers and emergency personnel injured. There were also reports of a protester death (cardiac arrest) and serious injuries, including from crowd-control munitions.
President Emmanuel Macron addressed the nation on Sunday evening, expressing “anger and shame,” distinguishing legitimate protesters from “ultra-left fringe groups” and criminals responsible for the “unbridled violence,” and vowing accountability. He stopped short of a state of emergency but authorized prefects and mayors to ban certain gatherings if needed to protect public buildings and businesses. Interior Minister Laurent Nuñez admitted police “lost control” in some areas, offered his resignation (which Macron declined), and the government is organizing meetings for concrete responses. As of Monday, October 19, partial curfew powers have been given to some cities, Marseille has banned public gatherings midday to 8 pm, the Louvre saw entrance blockades linked to student actions, and investigations into the violence are underway.
The situation remains tense ahead of the 2027 presidential election, with the government emphasizing order while acknowledging underlying social grievances.
Legal analyst Gregg Jarrett discusses a new memo exploring former special counsel Jack Smith’s alleged spying on MAGA supporters.
Arctic Frost was the internal code name for a joint federal investigation (involving the FBI, DOJ Office of Inspector General, U.S. Postal Inspection Service, and National Archives OIG) opened in April 2022 into alleged efforts by Donald Trump and associates to overturn the results of the 2020 U.S. presidential election. Official purpose and originIt focused primarily on the “fake electors” (or alternate electors) scheme, in which Trump allies in several battleground states submitted alternate slates of electors claiming Trump had won those states. The FBI’s opening document described it as probing a “multifaceted conspiracy to overturn the results of the 2020 Presidential Election so that former president Trump could remain in office.”
- It was opened by FBI Assistant Special Agent in Charge Timothy Thibault and formally approved by Attorney General Merrick Garland, Deputy Attorney General Lisa Monaco, and FBI Director Christopher Wray.
- In November 2022, Garland appointed Special Counsel Jack Smith, who took over Arctic Frost (along with related probes). This formed the basis for Smith’s August 2023 indictment of Trump on election-related charges (which did not proceed after Trump’s 2024 election win).
- Subpoenas and data collection targeting hundreds of Republican individuals, organizations, campaign staff, and fundraising efforts (Grassley has cited over 400 named Republican targets in some releases).
- Obtaining phone toll records (metadata) of multiple Republican members of Congress, including senators.
- Collection of extensive personal and donor data on at least 639,000 Republican donors, voters, and supporters (including names, addresses, emails, party registration, occupations, donation details, partial credit-card numbers, and information on buyers of red MAGA hats and Trump merchandise). Some of this data went back to 2005.
Saturday, October 17, 2026
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu reflects on his relationship with USA President Donald Trump ahead of his critical election.
Netanyahu’s recent appearance on Mark Levin’s Life, Liberty & Levin is a classic pre-election pitch emphasizing the unique U.S.-Israel partnership under Trump as a vehicle for regional peace and security if he is re-elected.
It comes days before Israel’s October 27 election, with polls indicating a tight contest or potential deadlock between Netanyahu’s right-wing bloc and an opposition slate involving figures such as Gadi Eisenkot, Naftali Bennett, and others. Netanyahu has framed the race in stark terms: voting Likud to prevent a left-leaning government reliant on Arab parties that he claims would constrain security action and risk a Palestinian state.
Core Messages
- Partnership with Trump and path to peace: The headline framing of the interview is that if Netanyahu is re-elected, the partnership with Trump will advance peace in the Middle East. He has described the relationship (in related or consistent remarks) as not fully equal—America leads the free world while Israel is its Middle East bastion—but grounded in mutual respect, open discussion, and “very clear unity of purpose.” This has enabled outcomes “not achievable before,” and he has contrasted it with prior U.S. presidents: “I’ve been around many presidents. I’ve appreciated them. I respected them a lot, but this is different.” He has also praised Trump’s “refreshing view” of the region and the administration’s support.
- Historical and legitimacy framing: A related clip from the same appearance has Netanyahu asserting that Israelis are not living on “stolen land” but are the indigenous people of the territory (Jews in Judea, not analogous to European colonialists in Indonesia or the Congo). This aligns with his broader recent response to comments (including those attributed to Barack Obama) questioning Israel’s claims or moral standing. It is a direct counter to occupation/settlement narratives.
- Media and information war: Consistent with past Levin interviews, he has treated mainstream media coverage and “disinformation” as an “eighth front” alongside Israel’s multi-front conflicts, arguing that lies spread instantly while truth requires facts and effort. He has called for shaming what he sees as unethical propaganda.
These points recycle and reinforce long-standing Netanyahu themes: personal chemistry and results with Trump (Abraham Accords, joint action against Iranian nuclear/missile capabilities, hostage/Gaza issues), “peace through strength,” and rejection of international double standards.
Political and Strategic Context
Netanyahu is leveraging the Trump relationship as an electoral asset to mobilize his base and undecided voters who prioritize the U.S. alliance and regional gains. Appearing on a friendly U.S. conservative platform signals strength and continuity to Israeli audiences via clips. He has also used domestic outlets (e.g., Channel 14) to call the race a “dead heat,” warn of Iranian/Hamas/Hezbollah attempts to interfere and topple him, attack the legal system and High Court, and stake out hardline positions on security and demographics.
Trump’s side of the equation is more reserved. In a recent Newsmax interview, Trump praised their “very good relationship,” “good success together,” and military partnership against Iran (which weakened Tehran’s capabilities). He noted that Israelis want him involved in the campaign and claimed high popularity among Israeli voters, but he stopped short of an endorsement and said “I don’t trust anybody” in politics when asked directly about Netanyahu. He has also hedged on timing of further Iran action and broader Middle East plans. Some reporting has floated ideas of a broader Israeli unity government (potentially involving Netanyahu for a limited period) to facilitate deals such as Saudi normalization—ideas that could create friction if they imply constraints on Netanyahu.
Assessment
This is effective base-mobilizing messaging that personalizes foreign-policy successes and ties re-election to continued U.S. partnership and future peace dividends. It counters Oct. 7 responsibility critiques, war costs, and the corruption trial by focusing on achievements and the alternative (a weaker government).
The relationship is asymmetric (U.S. primacy), and Trump’s independent style plus non-endorsement introduce uncertainty. Any visible daylight on Iran timing, Gaza sequencing, or Israeli government composition could be used by opponents. Netanyahu’s long strategy of tight personal alignment with the U.S. president has delivered outstanding results with President Trump's support, however it requires continuous management and tangible outcomes to remain persuasive. With the election so close, the interview is high-stakes continuity messaging rather than a major policy shift.
Friday, October 16, 2026
USA military deploying troops to Latin America in drug crackdown.
This deployment expands the Trump administration’s counter-cartel campaign beyond maritime boat strikes into more sustained ground-level military presence, training, and potential advisory support in partner countries. It forms part of a broader “Donroe Doctrine” emphasis on the Western Hemisphere as a priority theater, including the Americas Counter Cartel Coalition, new command structures in Miami, and drone shifts from Africa. Operational and strategic implications
- Soldiers from the 10th Mountain Division are conducting jungle training in Panama (a revived capability at a former U.S. facility) before joint exercises with forces in Colombia and Honduras. Some elements could support U.S. special operations personnel advising local raids against traffickers, provide helicopter security, or staff a new Western Hemisphere command. SOUTHCOM aims for “total systemic friction” on cartel networks rather than relying mainly on boat strikes.
- The scale is significant for routine training in the region. Analyst Adam Isacson (Washington Office on Latin America) has noted it stands out relative to historical deployments short of invasions or disasters; peak Plan Colombia U.S. troop levels in Colombia were capped near 600. The U.S. Embassy in Panama has clarified that current activity there involves roughly 120 troops in a temporary two-week course, with broader battalion elements rotating or staging under SOUTHCOM control.
- It builds local partner capacity in environments where cartels operate and aligns with agreements some governments (including newly elected leaders in Colombia and Honduras) have signaled for joint operations. It also supports the administration’s designation of numerous groups as foreign terrorist organizations.
- Reports explicitly note echoes of the long history of U.S. military involvement in Latin America, including the School of the Americas and interventions that often carried political and human-rights costs. Human-rights groups and some analysts warn of civilian risks if operations expand onto land, potential for extrajudicial perceptions around targeting, and mission creep if U.S. personnel are attacked.
- Sovereignty concerns persist in the region despite partner-government invitations. Escalation risks exist if U.S. forces become more directly involved, especially amid concurrent strains from other commitments (including the Iran conflict). Critics argue the strategy is overly militarized relative to law-enforcement, demand-reduction, or anti-corruption approaches and risks repeating past cycles of temporary disruption followed by adaptation.
Thursday, October 15, 2026
DEVELOPING: Major ESCALATION in Middle East | China's role is 'DEEPLY CONCERNING'.
What are the implications for the USA?
Direct security and military costs are rising for the US. The ongoing Iran war (US-Israeli strikes since late February 2026, with intermittent ceasefires) has expanded to include sustained Houthi attacks on Saudi civilian and energy targets plus a sharp increase in strikes on commercial shipping in the Strait of Hormuz.
This forces continued US naval and air presence to protect transit routes, raises the risk of further incidents involving US forces or partners, and complicates any effort to contain the conflict without additional strikes or resources. Some reporting links the recent Hormuz tempo increase to Iranian attempts to maintain leverage ahead of US midterms.
Energy and economic effects hit US interests through global markets.
Hormuz carries a large share of global oil exports; the surge in attacks (highest levels of the conflict this month, including sunk vessels) has already reduced flows at times and pushed Brent crude above $100. Higher energy prices raise costs for US consumers, businesses, and allies even though the US is a net oil producer. Disruptions also affect fertilizer and other commodity shipments, with secondary risks to food prices and inflation. Sustained pressure on shipping raises insurance and transport costs that feed into broader economic strain.
China’s dual-use support to Iran and regional positioning create longer-term strategic friction. Beijing continues buying Iranian oil (a key economic lifeline) and has been linked in multiple analyses to dual-use components, propellant chemicals, satellite/geospatial data, and limited air-defense items that help sustain Iranian capabilities. This undercuts US sanctions and military pressure while China avoids direct combat, calls for de-escalation, and deepens economic ties with Gulf states.
For the USA it means a more durable Iran that is harder to isolate, greater Chinese influence in a region where Washington has long provided security, and additional pressure on US-China relations over technology and dual-use exports. Gulf partners face incentives to hedge, testing the durability of US security guarantees. Overall, the escalation raises the operational burden, economic costs, and geopolitical competition for the United States without a clear near-term path to full de-escalation.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)