GotoTom2

Thursday, November 12, 2026

People use AI tools to create important work like below. LOL

@TheBTCTherapist Cool but this one is better. https://t.co/oDR0wQVJVI
— Hontas Farmer (@Hontas_Farmer) November 12, 2026

Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang stepped down from his role, effective immediately, as CEO of Nvidia after alleged cheating scandals surfaced. He is accused of having affairs with a company employee and a suspected Chinese spy.

White House 'border czar' Tom Homan joins 'America Reports' to discuss federal probes into Rep. Ilhan Omar, D-Minn., the threat of migrant caravans and more.

Tom Homan's recent appearance on Fox News' America Reports discussing the ongoing federal investigation into Rep. Ilhan Omar for alleged immigration and naturalization fraud.

As White House border czar, Homan has publicly confirmed Homeland Security Investigations involvement in the Omar probe, noting no one is above the law and referencing the possibility of denaturalization if fraud is proven.

Homan also addressed new migrant caravans forming in southern Mexico, attributing them to the "Biden effect" and stating the administration will turn back or prosecute entrants without releasing them into the US.

Is "Personalized Pricing" legal? Why are so many companies giving consumers different Prices for the same Product or Service?

We need new laws to ban "Personalized Pricing".

There is no federal ban on algorithmic or personalized pricing (also called surveillance pricing) in the U.S., but the FTC treats undisclosed use of personal data to set individualized prices as potentially unfair or deceptive under Section 5 of the FTC Act. States are moving faster, creating a patchwork of disclosure requirements and outright prohibitions, mainly focused on consumer personal data rather than pure supply-and-demand dynamic pricing.

Federal level

The FTC proposed an Enforcement Policy Statement on Personalized Pricing in August 2026. It states that where consumers reasonably expect prices to be uniform (not varying by personal data like browsing history, location, loyalty status, or willingness-to-pay estimates), companies must clearly and conspicuously disclose that a price is personalized, the basis for personalization, and the types of data used. Failure to do so is likely to violate Section 5. The FTC has acknowledged it lacks authority for an outright ban.

On October 28, 2026, the FTC issued Section 6(b) study orders (not an enforcement action) to nine companies—Delta, United, JetBlue, Lyft, Uber, DoorDash, Instacart, Target, and Walmart—seeking details on their use of personal data and AI/algorithms for consumer pricing and, for platforms, gig worker compensation. Responses are due roughly 45 days after receipt (around mid-December 2026). This follows a 2024 study the current Commission viewed as insufficient because it focused on intermediaries rather than the companies setting prices.

Proposed federal bills (such as versions of a Stop AI Price Gouging and Wage Fixing Act or One Fair Price Act) have been introduced but not enacted. Separate antitrust efforts target algorithms that use competitor data to facilitate collusion, distinct from individualized consumer pricing.

State level

States are the primary source of binding restrictions, with approaches ranging from disclosure to bans (often with exceptions for loyalty programs, cost-based differences, or promotions):

New York: Algorithmic Pricing Disclosure Act (in effect since late 2025) requires a clear notice stating “THIS PRICE WAS SET BY AN ALGORITHM USING YOUR PERSONAL DATA” when personal data is used. A broader ban has been considered.
Maryland: Protection from Predatory Pricing Act (effective October 1, 2026) restricts food retailers and certain delivery services from using personal data or dynamic pricing to charge higher prices to specific consumers.
Connecticut: Law (effective July 1, 2027) broadly bans “surveillance pricing” for retailers and delivery services using personal data, with some disclosure obligations.
New Jersey: Fair Price Protection Act (effective August 1, 2027) prohibits personalized/surveillance pricing for groceries and foodstuffs based on personal data and includes a private right of action.

California has targeted “common pricing algorithms” that use competitor data under its Cartwright Act (antitrust). Dozens of other states have considered or have pending bills. Scope, definitions of “personal data,” covered businesses, and exceptions vary significantly, creating compliance complexity for multistate operations.

Key distinctions and context

Personalized/surveillance pricing uses individual consumer data (or inferences from it) to estimate willingness to pay and set different prices for the same item/service. This is the main focus of the consumer-protection rules above.
Pure dynamic pricing based on real-time supply, demand, time, or location (common in rideshares or airlines) is generally treated differently and is more widely accepted, though it can overlap with personalized practices.
Enforcement remains evolving: the FTC’s recent orders are fact-finding, while states are already implementing rules. Undisclosed practices risk Section 5 claims federally and state AG or private actions where laws apply.

The legal landscape is actively developing, with the FTC study results and further state action expected to shape it further into 2027. Businesses using these tools should map data inputs, document justifications, and prepare clear disclosures. For the most current status on a specific state or practice, checking official legislative sources or recent FTC materials is advisable.

Wednesday, November 11, 2026

ASSASSINATION FEARS: Iranian threats DRIVE USA Secretary Scott Bessent to fortified military base.

USA Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent's relocation to a fortified military base following Iranian assassination threats tied to his leadership of economic sanctions.

Bessent directs Operation Economic Outcast, a Trump administration campaign of intensified sanctions, asset freezes, and financial isolation targeting Iran's regime, IRGC, and proxies since August 2026.

Reports from multiple outlets confirm the security move followed intelligence on advanced threats and a media photo that geolocated his Georgetown home.

Serious Questions about Voter Registration in Texas. What will happen at the USA Border with Communist Democrats in Power?

The USA Government has Failed to give Americans "Online Freedom of Speech".

https://t.co/NypuYPNQK5
— MAGAaTom -🇺🇸 🇺🇸- President Trump is Fantastic (@MAGAaTom) November 11, 2026

Please click here, and read the content that evil Google does not want you to see.

Tuesday, November 10, 2026

'THAT'S NOT TRUE': USA Attorney General Blanche FIRES BACK at Hegseth impeachment push.

The Communist Democrats are making up lies about Pete Hegseth.

Please watch this video to learn the truth.

Lawmakers DEMAND answers over NVIDIA CEO's affair with alleged Chinese spy.

Major outlets (New York Times, Financial Times, BBC, CNN, Reuters, Guardian, and others) have covered it extensively since late October/early November 2026. The core claims hold up as follows:

The affair is confirmed: Jensen Huang (NVIDIA’s CEO) publicly admitted in a company memo that he had been “unfaithful” to his wife and apologized for hurting her and their children. NVIDIA’s board then launched an independent investigation into reports that he was the target of a foreign intelligence effort.
The Chinese spy allegation: US intelligence officials assessed that Alice Huang (no relation), a former executive at Singapore-based Megaspeed (a major NVIDIA customer), was a Chinese Ministry of State Security asset who cultivated a close relationship with Jensen Huang. Reporting indicates electronic surveillance revealed the relationship. China has called the claims “groundless” and a smear. NVIDIA has stated it has no reason to believe national security or company secrets were compromised, but is investigating.
Lawmakers’ response: Republican chairs of relevant House committees (China, Foreign Affairs, Intelligence) have formally requested a closed-door briefing from Huang on the national security implications. Broader congressional scrutiny is underway, and there is a shareholder lawsuit against NVIDIA and Huang over alleged failure to disclose the risks.

President Trump has also commented publicly, noting the FBI is looking into aspects of it while expressing confidence in Huang.

The story is real and ongoing. The “alleged/suspected” language is accurate because the spy determination rests on intelligence assessments rather than public criminal charges at this stage. Investigations (NVIDIA’s internal one and any US government ones) are still in progress.

Nav Bar - List of Links