Below is an interesting article regarding the Google CEO.
I am not a fan of the New York Times or David Brooks in general, however he is an excellent writer and makes some valid points in this article.
I do NOT want Google to censor articles like this.
Why is Google unfairly censoring this article by David Brooks?
The FTC needs to stop Google from this evil unfair censorship.
GotoTom2.blogspot.com/search?q=google+censorship
GotoTom2.blogspot.com/search?q=google+censorship
nytimes.com/2017/08/11/opinion/sundar-pichai-google-memo-diversity.html
Screen shot of the Google cache for the article.
Screen shot of the Google cache for the article.
Then I started to do some more research on this David Brooks New York Times situation with Google.
It looks like the entire New York Times is no longer in the Google cache, even the home page. Google is making this tricky, yet it is a powerful and more clever form of censorship by Google. If you do a Google search for "david brooks new york times articles" the article calling for Sundar Pichai to resign is no where to be found.
On the second page of the search results there are articles from other powerful websites about the David Brooks article, however Google has successfully censored the article by David Brooks calling for Sundar Pichai to resign.
It is difficult to find in many related searches e.g. "nytimes David Brooks", etc. I would also think the overall traffic for the New York Times may drop do to this. I want to be clear, I have no evidence of the New York Times traffic from Google dropping off, I just think that may happen over the next few months.
Another SEO factor to consider is the fact that several powerful sites link to the article that calls for the Google CEO to resign. This means that the "Google CEO should resign article" should be #1 in the search results, based on the other strong Pagerank sites linking to it. This is more evidence that Google is censoring the NYtimes.com. The reason I say Google is being "tricky" is that the general public does not understand these search engine optimization (SEO) factors. Also you would have to compile detailed research on many different keyword searches. When you are a small unimportant site Google is much more blatant and harsh in their unfair censorship methods. E.g. 7MEG.net , if you do a Google search for "7meg" this site is missing from the Google results.
*
It is difficult to find in many related searches e.g. "nytimes David Brooks", etc. I would also think the overall traffic for the New York Times may drop do to this. I want to be clear, I have no evidence of the New York Times traffic from Google dropping off, I just think that may happen over the next few months.
Another SEO factor to consider is the fact that several powerful sites link to the article that calls for the Google CEO to resign. This means that the "Google CEO should resign article" should be #1 in the search results, based on the other strong Pagerank sites linking to it. This is more evidence that Google is censoring the NYtimes.com. The reason I say Google is being "tricky" is that the general public does not understand these search engine optimization (SEO) factors. Also you would have to compile detailed research on many different keyword searches. When you are a small unimportant site Google is much more blatant and harsh in their unfair censorship methods. E.g. 7MEG.net , if you do a Google search for "7meg" this site is missing from the Google results.
Below is the screen shot of what I see when I check if the NYtimes.com home page is in the Google cache.
Below is the Google search results for the LAtimes.com, you can see the LAtimes is in the Google cache and this shows how Google has penalized and censored the NYtimes.com.
