Google has illegally broken into my Blogs over 100 times. Google has edited and illegally deleted some of my content. Additionally, X, Meta, and Google are still censoring many people, including me. Elon Musk never fixed any of the evil censorship that Jack Dorsey and his team built into the X software. We do not have online freedom of speech.
Thursday, May 19, 2016
Monday, May 16, 2016
Sunday, May 15, 2016
Great Post by Google CEO Sundar Pichai, Let's Not Let Fear Defeat Our Values
I first posted this on 2-1-16 and I think it is good to read it every few months as we continue our battle to defeat ISIS. This article by Sundar shows the good, proud side of what America is and the opportunities freedom offers to every citizen of the USA that is willing to work for it. Sundar's life story is a great example for young people looking for a role model.
I have been reading the posts of Sundar Pichai, and I like and respect him.
I think that he is not afraid to politely speak out and voice his opinions when many CEO's will just not comment at all. This demonstrates to me that Mr. Pichai has a strong moral character and is not afraid to stand up and help "those who are less represented" (the underdog).
Even if you do not agree with Mr. Pichai, his real name is Pichai Sundararajan, please respect and honor all people's freedom of speech. I enjoy these American success stories and it helps the USA to be recognized as the world leader and example for true freedom and democracy in every country on earth. I believe all US citizens should have a duty to promote free speech and democracy and to help oppressed people in other countries.
Please read his excellent article that should hopefully make all Americans think.
I have been reading the posts of Sundar Pichai, and I like and respect him.
I think that he is not afraid to politely speak out and voice his opinions when many CEO's will just not comment at all. This demonstrates to me that Mr. Pichai has a strong moral character and is not afraid to stand up and help "those who are less represented" (the underdog).
Even if you do not agree with Mr. Pichai, his real name is Pichai Sundararajan, please respect and honor all people's freedom of speech. I enjoy these American success stories and it helps the USA to be recognized as the world leader and example for true freedom and democracy in every country on earth. I believe all US citizens should have a duty to promote free speech and democracy and to help oppressed people in other countries.
Please read his excellent article that should hopefully make all Americans think.
sundar_pichai/let-s-not-let-fear-defeat-our-values-af2e5ca92371#.bliiu97cq
"A person who is happy is not because everything is right in his life, he is happy because his attitude towards everything in his life is right."
"A person who is happy is not because everything is right in his life, he is happy because his attitude towards everything in his life is right."
Sunday, May 01, 2016
Correct USA Political 2016 Information, and Projections of Who will Win the Republican Nomination
Here I am again writing about political issues when I am primarily a SEO, Technology and Business Blog.
However I am explaining the statistical and procedural processes of how the Republican candidate is selected.
It bothers me how stupid many of the TV reporters are and how they cannot even interview guests that know the correct facts. One person who really knows how this works and he just laughs at all these totally incorrect TV reporters is Newt Gingrich.
The general public should understand all these TV people do is read the news. Their correct title is "news reader" not "journalist". Even the highly respected "theguardian.com" has the facts wrong.
The Republican nominee facts and how the process really works.
- 1237 Delegates votes are needed to win the nomination. The only two people that have any chance are Donald Trump and Ted Cruz.
I used to like John Kasich however the fact that he is being an idiot bonehead and not dropping out is proof he is not qualified to be President even in four or eight years from now.
Saturday, April 23, 2016
Warning to Blogger Users, the New "Featured Post Widget" Causes a Google Duplicate Content Penalty. Do Not Use a Text Snippet in "Featured Post"
Update 4-20-16
Great news, after I removed the text snippet from the "Featured Post" to the right of this webpage Google has now indexed this webpage and it is fine now.
Thank you Google.
Friday, April 15, 2016
Thursday, April 14, 2016
Tuesday, April 12, 2016
Google Gives Out New Penalties to Websites with Unnatural Outbound Links, Fundamental Problems Still Exist
Google has given out another round of "unnatural link" penalties. Hopefully Google has done a better job this time, because in the past Google has made many mistakes unfairly penalizing websites. I wrote an article and documented this and I give specific examples that I know Google has read. Just like our legal system makes mistakes and sometimes puts innocent people in jail, Google has the same problem.
Yet can Google afford to do nothing, and let the quality of their search results decline?
In this example case of a site penalized you can see the frustration of this webmaster as she has no clue about any of this.
I don't even know what an "unnatural link" is. I read the Help topics linked in the email and they were not of any help. I have no idea why I received this because I have not done anything to artificially boost my traffic. I'm not part of any "link scheme." I haven't changed anything that would cause this, and I haven't seen any crawlers or anything unusual in my Google Analytics. The funny thing is, I have two domains that redirect to the same blog, and I only received this email for one of them.
It's a beauty blog, so I often link to beauty products. Is that the problem? Do I have to go back to every single one of my posts from 2013 and take them out? My affiliate links are how I monetize my blog. What is this "nofollow" thing?
It is interesting how Google keeps trying new ways of doing this. In the past when Google penalized sites for buying links, people that were guilty could try to claim they "cannot control who links to them". Which by the way is a good argument, and so now by going after the sites with outbound links Google does not like, it takes away this argument. In this Google forum (above) the penalized site owner asks if there are tools to determine which links are bad. There are a few and they are horrible, do not use them. SearchEngineLand wrote an article about this, that I tore to pieces for being one of the stupidest and dumbest SEO tools ever created. This is why SearchEngineLand is only good for SEO news and not for SEO advice.
I also have to blame and call Google out again for poor implementation and making it difficult for webmasters to follow Google Guidelines.
What exactly do I mean?
Yet can Google afford to do nothing, and let the quality of their search results decline?
In this example case of a site penalized you can see the frustration of this webmaster as she has no clue about any of this.
I don't even know what an "unnatural link" is. I read the Help topics linked in the email and they were not of any help. I have no idea why I received this because I have not done anything to artificially boost my traffic. I'm not part of any "link scheme." I haven't changed anything that would cause this, and I haven't seen any crawlers or anything unusual in my Google Analytics. The funny thing is, I have two domains that redirect to the same blog, and I only received this email for one of them.
It's a beauty blog, so I often link to beauty products. Is that the problem? Do I have to go back to every single one of my posts from 2013 and take them out? My affiliate links are how I monetize my blog. What is this "nofollow" thing?
It is interesting how Google keeps trying new ways of doing this. In the past when Google penalized sites for buying links, people that were guilty could try to claim they "cannot control who links to them". Which by the way is a good argument, and so now by going after the sites with outbound links Google does not like, it takes away this argument. In this Google forum (above) the penalized site owner asks if there are tools to determine which links are bad. There are a few and they are horrible, do not use them. SearchEngineLand wrote an article about this, that I tore to pieces for being one of the stupidest and dumbest SEO tools ever created. This is why SearchEngineLand is only good for SEO news and not for SEO advice.
I also have to blame and call Google out again for poor implementation and making it difficult for webmasters to follow Google Guidelines.
What exactly do I mean?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)